Without Prejudice Conversations And Settlement Agreements

Filed Under Uncategorized 

Instead of trying to initiate verbal discussions, it will generally be easier to present the topics in writing in a non-prejudiced letter. (We have a helpful guide on how to write letters without prejudice.) I was sent back to Alex to guide me through my transaction agreement. She was fantastic throughout the process, kept me up to date regularly and answered all the questions I had quickly and professionally. I would not hesitate to recommend them. Your employer also wants you to sign a transaction agreement to confirm that you no longer wish to appeal against them. I just want to say a big thank you for everything, and to believe in me, I wouldn`t be where I am now, without your help. Although there is no limitation of rights that can be applied in accordance with the principle without prejudice (only the existence of litigation), an employer can only invoke the protection against termination of Section 111A for ordinary claims unjustified to dismissal. This means that the fact or content of such negotiations may be mentioned in other types of rights, such as discrimination, whistleblower or automatic unfair dismissal, unless they are covered by the principle of no prejudice. If there is an existing dispute and both parties are willing to discuss reaching an agreement, the content of these relevant discussions or documents can be characterized as “unprejudiced” and cannot be disclosed later in court – they are truly “off-the-record”. There will clearly be a dispute, for example if the employer has announced its intention to lay off for gross misconduct and then discusses alternative methods of dismissal with workers. This rule was essentially intended to prevent oral/written documents and exchanges from being presented in evidence to an employment tribunal.

The advantage of this scheme is that it allows the parties to attempt to resolve a dispute without fear of the legal consequences of the “citation”. I would like to thank Alexandra Bullmore of the Smith Partnership for her help and advice in dealing with a settlement agreement. I am very pleased with the result she has achieved. However, there are significant restrictions on the use of “protected conversations,” as follows. A worker cannot rely on such a settlement offer as a reason for resignation and a requirement for constructive dismissal. If HR or management make you an unprejudiced offer, the best advice would be to say that you are thinking about what they have to say and that you come back to them.


Comments are closed.

Related Links